Microsoft Pricing Negotiation
Introduction – Why Microsoft Quotes Are Hard to Read
Microsoft’s pricing quotes can feel like a maze of numbers and jargon. This complexity is not accidental.
A typical Microsoft quote is filled with multiple product SKUs and unclear discounts that make it difficult to pinpoint exactly what you’re paying for each component. Read our Microsoft Negotiation Guide.
Microsoft often presents information in a way that benefits them – bundling products and using internal codes that are hard to decipher – which can obscure which items are overpriced or unnecessary for your organization.
To navigate this, it helps to understand a few key terms in the quote. Each line item usually includes a SKU (Stock Keeping Unit, Microsoft’s product code for the specific license or service) and a license count (the quantity of that item you’re buying).
You’ll also see a list price (Microsoft’s official price per unit) and a net price (the price you pay after any discount). Often, a discount percentage is shown, indicating how much was taken off the list price.
For example, a line might show Office 365 E3 with a list price of $100 and a net price of $80, meaning a 20% discount. These quotes are intentionally dense, but by breaking them down, you can identify where Microsoft may be padding the deal in their favor.
The goal of this guide is to help you dissect your Microsoft quote and turn it into a starting point for negotiation.
We’ll explain how to read between the lines of Microsoft’s pricing, spot overpriced components, and push back to achieve a better deal.
Remember: that initial quote you received is just Microsoft’s opening offer, not the final word.
Understanding List Prices vs. Discounts
At the core of any Microsoft quote are the list prices and the discounts applied. Microsoft’s list price is the baseline cost for a product—essentially the sticker price without any concessions.
In enterprise agreements, Microsoft has historically used volume-based pricing levels (commonly known as Level A, B, C, and D) to automatically adjust the list prices depending on the size of your organization.
For instance, a smaller company might fall into Level A (higher per-unit prices), while a large enterprise with thousands of seats might be Level D (lower per-unit prices due to built-in volume discounts).
In practical terms, a Level D customer traditionally enjoyed a cheaper starting price than a Level A customer for the same product, even before any special negotiation, reflecting the volume-based discount.
However, it’s crucial to note that “standard” discounts are rarely the best you can do. Microsoft might say you’re getting, say, a 15% discount off list as a standard practice—perhaps due to your volume or an EA level—but that is just a baseline.
In many enterprise deals, it’s common to negotiate well beyond those automatic discounts. For example, an initial quote might show a 15–20% discount on a Microsoft 365 license.
Still, with pushback and leverage, enterprises often secure total discounts of 25%, 30%, or more on big-ticket items. The key point: don’t take Microsoft’s first discount offer as their final offer.
Also, be aware of recent shifts in Microsoft’s pricing approach. As of 2025, Microsoft has been moving to eliminate some of the automatic volume-based pricing tiers for certain cloud services (like Microsoft 365 and Dynamics 365). This means large customers might no longer get an automatic “Level D” reduction baked in.
Instead, every discount has to be explicitly negotiated. Microsoft’s strategy here is to standardize pricing, but in reality, it puts the onus on you to secure a good deal.
If your quote seems to have a smaller discount than you expected, it may be because Microsoft is now expecting to negotiate each percentage point. All the more reason to come prepared with a counteroffer.
In summary, always differentiate between the list price and the net price on your quote, and scrutinize the discount percentage. Treat the list price as a starting figure and the initial discount as a modest opening gesture.
You should remain skeptical of any claim like “this is our standard discount”. In Microsoft pricing negotiations, “standard” usually means there’s plenty of room for improvement if you ask for it.
Very important to read, Must-Have Terms in Your Microsoft Contract: Negotiation ‘Red Lines”.
Cost Components in a Microsoft Quote
When you break down a Microsoft proposal, you’ll typically find several major cost components.
Understanding each category will help you identify where you have negotiation leverage and where you might be overspending:
- License costs (perpetual or subscription software): This includes the core software licenses for things like Windows, Office, or server products, as well as client access licenses (CALs) if you still use on-prem servers. In modern quotes, this often appears as subscriptions to Microsoft 365 plans (Office 365, Enterprise Mobility & Security, Windows Enterprise, etc.). These are usually the largest portion of the quote. The good news is that license costs are highly negotiable. Microsoft’s profit margins on software are large, especially on bundles like Microsoft 365 E5, so they have the flexibility to discount these. Enterprises commonly overspend here by accepting high-end licenses for all users or paying for features that not everyone needs (more on that later).
- Software Assurance (SA): If you are purchasing any perpetual licenses or if you have existing licenses, Software Assurance is the annual maintenance fee that provides access to upgrades, support, and other benefits. In many quotes, license + SA is bundled together over a three-year deal (for example, an EA will often price a product as “License & SA”). SA costs can be significant – roughly 25% of a license’s cost per year historically – but like license fees, they can be negotiated. Ensure you actually need the benefits of SA on all products; sometimes companies blindly renew SA on software they don’t plan to upgrade or could replace with cloud services, leading to overspend.
- Cloud subscriptions and usage commitments: This covers Microsoft’s cloud services such as Microsoft 365 (enterprise plans for Office, EMS, Windows), Dynamics 365 CRM/ERP modules, Power Platform, and Azure cloud credits. These are subscription-based services quoted per user per month or as a lump sum commitment for Azure. Azure in particular might appear as a large monetary commitment (e.g., committing $X million over 3 years). Cloud services usually come with some discount or incentive if you commit to a certain volume or multi-year term. They are negotiable both in unit price (for something like a Dynamics 365 seat or a Power BI license) and in terms of commitment incentives (Azure might have a larger discount if you agree to spend more, for example). Watch out for overcommitment: if Microsoft’s quote assumes a higher usage than you anticipate, you have room to scale it down and save cost.
- Support and add-on services: Microsoft often offers support plans (like Unified Support or formerly Premier Support) alongside your licensing agreement, as well as add-on services such as consulting hours, training credits, or special add-on products (e.g., GitHub Enterprise, security assessments, etc.). These might be listed as separate line items or bundled into the deal “at a discount.” Support costs, in particular, can be substantial – Microsoft’s Unified Support is typically priced as a percentage of your total license spend. The more you spend on licenses, the more support costs. The support line is negotiable to an extent (you can sometimes negotiate a cap or a custom discount, especially if you hint you might consider third-party support providers). Additionally, you might choose not to include support in the quote at all and handle it separately. Always evaluate add-on services critically: are they necessary or just “nice to have” upsells? It’s common for enterprises to overspend by accepting packaged services that they could procure more cheaply elsewhere or not use fully.
Each of these components can contribute to overspending if not right-sized. The key is to analyze each category in your quote and ask: Is this cost justified for our needs? For example, if a huge chunk of your quote is for Microsoft 365 E5 licenses, are you using all those E5 features? If you see an expensive support line, have you compared it to your actual support usage or third-party alternatives?
By breaking the quote into these pieces, you can target which areas to negotiate. Generally, licenses and cloud subscriptions offer the biggest negotiation wiggle room, while certain standardized offerings (like some support plans or fixed-fee services) might be less flexible.
But even if an item’s price can’t move much, you always have the option to adjust scope or quantity to reduce cost (fewer licenses, lower-tier licenses, removing optional services, etc.).
Identifying Overpriced Items
One of the most important skills in Microsoft quote analysis is spotting the overpriced or unnecessary items. These things pad Microsoft’s revenue but may not deliver proportional value to you.
These often appear as products licensed broadly that only a subset of users need, or extras that were slipped into the proposal under the guise of a deal. Here’s how to find them:
- Licenses that not everyone needs: Check if the quote is licensing specialized software to all users by default. A classic example is Microsoft Visio or Project. We often see quotes where every user has a Visio or Project Online license in the bundle, even though maybe only the engineering team or a specific department actually uses those tools. Suppose your quote shows hundreds or thousands of Visio licenses but only a dozen people in your company genuinely create diagrams. In that case, that’s a red flag – you’re about to overpay for unnecessary licenses. The fix: scale those down to match actual need (or remove them entirely and add later if needed). The savings can be significant.
- High-end bundles for every user: Microsoft loves to pitch its top-tier bundles (like Office 365 E5 or Microsoft 365 E5) across the board. E5 includes advanced security, analytics, and voice features – great for power users, but overkill for many employees. If your quote has the entire organization on an E5 plan by default, consider how many users truly need that level. Often, a large portion of users can thrive on an E3 or E1 plan at a much lower cost, with only specific groups requiring an E5 plan. Identifying this over-licensing is crucial. For example, one enterprise found they had a block of E5 licenses where the users were only using email and Office (basically E3 functionality). They negotiated to downgrade a chunk of those to E3, which instantly shaved costs without impacting productivity. Don’t pay for ultra-premium features for someone who just needs the basics.
- Bundled add-ons with dubious value: Microsoft sales reps often bundle add-on products or services into your quote, promoting them as “you’re getting a big discount on this extra thing.” This could be an advanced security package, analytics tools like Power BI Pro for all users, or even an offer to include something like Windows Defender ATP, Microsoft Viva, or a limited-time discount on Microsoft’s new AI features. While the add-on might indeed be marked with a discount, ask yourself if you would have bought it separately. Sometimes these are nice-to-have products that weren’t on your roadmap until Microsoft pushed them. If an item was not in your original requirements, there’s a good chance it’s not truly needed. Those “discounts” can lure you into paying for something that delivers little value (also known as shelfware if it goes unused). Identify these by looking at any line item you don’t recognize or didn’t explicitly request, and evaluate its necessity.
- Over-provisioned quantities: Microsoft quotes sometimes include growth or a buffer without explicit agreement. Maybe the quote assumes you’ll need 10% more licenses than you have users (to cover new hires or projects), or it includes cloud consumption well above your current usage trend. These inflated counts mean you’d be paying for capacity you aren’t using yet. While planning for growth is fine, you don’t have to pay for it up front. You can negotiate the quantities down to current needs and handle future expansion with true-ups or separate orders later. Don’t let Microsoft’s optimistic assumptions about your expansion lead to an overpriced deal.
To effectively identify these items, conduct an internal usage audit in conjunction with the quote. List each product in the quote and ask: How many people actually use this? Is there a more affordable alternative or a lower-tier option that suits most users? By doing this homework, you’ll uncover which line items are candidates for removal or reduction.
Many companies are surprised to find, for example, that a large portion of their quote is for features or products only a small fraction of employees use.
Once you’ve identified these, you can go back to Microsoft and remove or scale back those items, which often immediately cuts out a chunk of cost. Remember, Microsoft’s initial quote is often their dream scenario – you buying everything, at possibly higher quantities or tiers than necessary. Your job is to trim the fat.
Negotiation Tactics for the Quote
Once you’ve analyzed the quote and pinpointed where it doesn’t align with your needs or budget, it’s time to go back to Microsoft with a counteroffer.
Here are some practical negotiation tactics to turn that quote in your favor:
- Ask for a revised quote with adjustments: Don’t hesitate to literally ask Microsoft to rework the numbers. Come back with a list of changes you want – for example, “Remove Visio licenses for all but 50 users,” or “Show us pricing with 60% of users on E3 and 40% on E5 instead of 100% E5,” or “We don’t need this Azure add-on, take it out.” By requesting a revised quote, you’re signaling that you’re an informed buyer. Microsoft often initially quotes a “kitchen sink” proposal; it’s on you to pare it down. A concrete ask forces them to do the math and show you the impact. You might be surprised how quickly the total drops once those extras are gone or reduced.
- Challenge their assumptions: Microsoft’s quote is full of assumptions – about your user count, your product mix, and what you’re willing to buy. If they assume every employee needs the top-tier license or that you’ll happily commit to $5 million in Azure consumption annually, push back. Explain your actual use case: “We have 1,000 users, but only 700 are active at any given time due to contractors. We want pricing for 700, not 1,000.” Or “Not all our teams need the full Office suite, some only require email and Teams – quote us an E1 for those.” By correcting these assumptions, you not only reduce cost but also show Microsoft that you’re not accepting their template wholesale. This often prompts them to refine the deal more realistically rather than risk losing it.
- Push for deeper discounts on high-margin items: Identify the parts of the quote where Microsoft has a lot of profit margin – those are your targets for extra discount. Typically, software subscriptions and high-end licenses (such as Microsoft 365 E5, Dynamics modules, Power BI Pro, and advanced security add-ons) have a considerable markup. Microsoft can afford to give a bigger percentage off because its costs are low. When negotiating, be direct: “We need a better discount on these E5 licenses. 15% off isn’t enough; we know other deals of our size get closer to 25%.” Or “If we’re taking Azure at this commitment level, we expect more than a 5% discount – we’d like 10%.” It helps to justify your ask with reasoning (usage volume, competitive context, or benchmark data as we’ll cover next). Microsoft won’t volunteer a higher discount on its own; you have to explicitly request it. Often, sales reps have approval to go lower in price if the deal size or competitive pressure warrants it, but only if you push them. Focus your efforts especially on the big-ticket line items – negotiating an extra 5-10% off a multimillion-dollar cloud subscription will yield bigger savings than haggling over a minor one-time fee.
- Frame the quote as just a starting point: It’s important to set the tone with Microsoft that you view their quote as an opening offer. You might literally say, “We see this quote as a first draft. Let’s work together to get to something that meets our budget and requirements.” This reminds them (and perhaps your own team) that you’re not compelled to accept as-is. Emphasize that some parts of the proposal don’t work for you and that you intend to negotiate line by line if needed. Microsoft’s reps are trained negotiators who expect savvy customers to counter – in fact, if you don’t negotiate, they likely leave money on the table because they anticipated you would. By making it clear that you consider the initial quote the starting point, you encourage Microsoft to come back with improvements rather than defending every line to the death. It also psychologically prepares them to justify each part of the deal or concede where they can. Remember, everything in a Microsoft quote is up for discussion. You won’t get what you don’t ask for, and the quote won’t get better until you show that you’re willing to walk away or explore alternatives.
- Leverage timing and Microsoft’s goals: (As an added tactic, consider when you’re negotiating. Microsoft has quarterly and annual sales targets; it often offers the best concessions near the end of its fiscal year or quarter. If it’s feasible, timing your quote discussions to align with Microsoft’s end-of-quarter or end-of-year can increase your leverage. For example, asking for that extra discount in June when Microsoft’s fiscal year ends on June 30 might find a more receptive ear if they need your deal to hit their numbers. While this isn’t about the content of the quote itself, it’s a tactic to keep in your back pocket during negotiation – the same ask might get a yes in late June that would get a no in early in the quarter.)
Throughout these negotiations, maintain a firm but collaborative tone. You want Microsoft to feel you’re serious about getting a better deal, but also that they have a path to keep your business by flexing on price or terms.
Be prepared to walk through the quote with them line by line. Often, it helps to prioritize your requests: know which cost reductions or changes matter most and push hard on those, while being willing to concede or compromise on lesser items.
The result should be a quote that is streamlined, aligned with your actual needs, and priced more competitively.
Using Benchmarks to Strengthen Negotiation
One of the strongest assets in a Microsoft pricing negotiation is benchmark information – knowing what other companies similar to yours are paying for the same licenses or services.
Microsoft’s worst fear is an informed customer who can challenge their prices with data. By bringing benchmarks into the conversation, you prevent Microsoft from controlling the narrative on what’s a “fair” price.
Start by researching or gathering intel on going rates. This can come from various sources: industry peers, consultants or advisory firms that specialize in Microsoft deals, or even quotes from Microsoft’s other sales channels like Cloud Solution Providers (CSPs).
For instance, if you have a friendly connection in another company’s IT procurement, you might learn, “Company X of our size got 25% off on Microsoft 365 E5 licenses.” Or an advisor might tell you that “Azure commitments around $3M/year are typically seeing a 10-15% discount these days.” There are also user groups and forums where people anonymously share their experiences with deals. The more data points you have, the better.
When you have these benchmarks, use them strategically in negotiation. Rather than blindly saying “this is too expensive,” you can be specific: “Our understanding is that the market rate (for a deal of our size) for Office 365 E3 is about $X per user, but your quote has it at $X+Y. We need to close that gap.” Or “We’ve seen discounts of around 20% for this product in similar situations – we expect something in that ballpark.”
This immediately signals to Microsoft’s reps that you’ve done your homework. It puts pressure on them to justify why your quote is higher, or to match the lower price to win your business.
Another approach is to use alternative quotes as leverage. Even if you intend to stick with an Enterprise Agreement, you could get a quote from a CSP partner or check Microsoft’s online pricing for month-to-month subscriptions.
If, for example, the CSP route or online pricing (with its flexibility) would cost you only slightly more than the EA quote, you can go to Microsoft and say, “If the EA doesn’t yield a substantial savings, we have the option to go month-to-month via CSP. Give us a reason to lock into a three-year EA by improving these numbers.”
Microsoft knows that if you’re willing to unbundle and shop around, it needs to make the consolidated deal attractive. On large deals, companies sometimes even subtly involve competitive products (like Google Workspace vs. Office 365) in negotiations.
You might mention, “We’re also evaluating whether we keep certain workloads on Microsoft or explore others,” without making any threats. Just planting the idea that you have choices can encourage Microsoft to sharpen its pencil.
It’s also wise to set internal targets for your negotiation, based on benchmarks.
Before you even send your counter-proposal back, decide: “We won’t sign unless we get at least X% off this component, or a total contract value below $Y.” These targets should be grounded in reality (benchmarks help here) but also ensure you’re pushing for a deal that meets your savings goals.
By having a clear goal, you prevent the negotiation from ending too early. Microsoft might improve the quote slightly and say, “How’s that?” – if you know you’re still above market or above your target, you keep pushing.
In summary, knowledge is power. Microsoft’s initial quotes often bank on customers not knowing what others pay. When you counter with benchmarks and alternative options, you flip the script.
You’re no longer just a price-taker; you become an informed negotiator who can credibly say, “That’s not good enough – I know we can do better, because others have.”
This not only helps you get a better price but also often earns you more respect in the negotiation process, leading Microsoft to take your asks more seriously.
FAQs
- What is a typical discount off Microsoft’s list price? – It really varies by deal size and the products in question. In general, even a small enterprise agreement might get at least 10% off list prices, and larger organizations often see 15–25% or more on many items. There isn’t a fixed “typical” number because Microsoft will try to give the minimum discount necessary to close the deal. The key is that it’s always negotiable. If you’re being offered only a small discount, you should assume there’s room to improve it. Microsoft’s first offer is seldom its best offer.
- Can Microsoft add extra incentives if we commit more? – Yes, absolutely. Microsoft often provides better pricing or incentives as your commitment grows. For example, if you agree to a larger Azure spend (or add more users/products than initially planned), they might unlock a higher discount percentage or offer free additional months of service, credits, or funding for deployment services. They may also bundle in promotions (like discounted rates on new products such as Microsoft 365 Copilot or extra support) if you commit early or for a longer term. Just be sure that any extra commitment aligns with your actual needs – don’t commit to a lot more just for a slightly better discount, or you could erase the savings by overspending on things you don’t use.
- Is every item on the quote negotiable? – Practically speaking, most items have some flexibility, but not every line is equally negotiable. Core product licenses and subscriptions are usually very negotiable (Microsoft can adjust its margins on those). Certain things, such as regulatory-required services, third-party pass-through products, or very low-margin hardware (if any), might not budge much. Additionally, Microsoft has some programs (especially for the public sector or academia) where pricing is more standardized. But in a typical enterprise quote, you should assume you can negotiate almost everything. If an item’s price can’t be lowered, you can consider other forms of negotiation on it. For example, if Microsoft won’t discount a specific software further, maybe they can throw in an extra six months at no charge, or add consulting hours, or improve payment terms. Every line item should be examined, and if the price truly can’t move, ask, “What else can we get?” Often, something that looks non-negotiable might be negotiable in a different way (quantity, terms, etc.). The bottom line: you won’t know until you ask.
Read about our Microsoft Negotiation Services.
