Azure Reserved Instances vs. Pay-As-You-Go: Cost Comparison Guide

Azure Reserved Instances vs. Pay-As-You-Go

Introduction – Why Compare RIs and PAYG?

Cloud cost management is all about balancing savings and flexibility.

Microsoft Azure offers two primary pricing models for running resources: Pay-As-You-Go (PAYG) and Reserved Instances (RIs). Pay-As-You-Go is the on-demand model where you pay for what you use with no long-term commitment.

In contrast, Reserved Instances let you commit to a certain resource for 1 or 3 years in exchange for significantly lower pricing.

Deciding between Azure RIs versus PAYG can have a big impact on your cloud budget. Enterprises must weigh the guaranteed savings of RIs against the freedom of on-demand usage. Read our overview, ” Azure Cost Management & Licensing: Negotiation Tactics for Cloud Savings.

In simple terms, Azure Reserved Instances lock in a discounted rate for a resource (like a virtual machine) when you commit to use it for a fixed term.

This upfront commitment (which Azure allows you to pay either all at once or monthly) can slash costs, but it assumes you’ll actually use that resource consistently. Azure Pay-As-You-Go, on the other hand, charges the full price hour by hour with no commitment.

It’s completely flexible; you can start or stop resources anytime, but it’s the most expensive rate. Companies often find themselves asking: “Should we reserve capacity to save money, or pay premium rates to stay agile?”

The answer depends on your workloads. This guide will compare Azure RIs vs. PAYG in terms of cost differences, best use cases, flexibility, and provide a strategy to choose the right mix.

The goal is to help cloud cost managers and IT finance teams avoid overspending, whether that comes from overcommitting to unused resources or from staying on high on-demand rates longer than necessary.

Cost Differences: Azure RI vs. PAYG

The biggest factor in the Reserved Instance vs. on-demand debate is cost.

Azure RI savings can be substantial. Typically, a 1-year reserved instance offers roughly 30% savings compared to PAYG, while a 3-year reserved instance can save around 45–50% (or even more in some cases).

The longer you commit, the deeper the discount Azure provides. Cloud providers price on-demand rates high to encourage these commitments and for good reason: if you truly have a steady workload, committing to an RI can almost cut your costs in half.

To illustrate the cost difference, consider a hypothetical Azure virtual machine that costs $100 per month on a pay-as-you-go plan.

If you purchase a 1-year reservation for that VM, the price might drop to roughly $70 per month. A 3-year reservation could lower it further to about $50 per month. The table below shows this example and the savings:

In this scenario, a 3-year RI for the VM would cost only half of the on-demand price a massive difference. Over the course of a year, that’s the difference between paying $1,200 (on-demand) versus $600 (with a 3-year commitment) for the same resource.

Multiply such savings across dozens of VMs or databases, and the appeal of RIs is clear for budget-conscious teams. Azure RI savings directly reduce your cloud bill for predictable workloads.

However, it’s important to be skeptical of overspend risks when looking at these numbers.

The discounts only pay off if you actually utilize the reserved resource fully. With pay-as-you-go, you’re paying a premium for flexibility, but you never pay for time when you’re not using the resource.

With a reservation, you pay the discounted rate regardless of usage – if the VM sits idle or a project ends early, that money is still spent.

In short, RIs can significantly lower costs for always-on workloads, while PAYG might end up cheaper for sporadic usage. The key is understanding your usage patterns, which leads to the next point: when to use each model.

Read how you should be Negotiating Azure Commitments: How to Secure Discounts on Your Cloud Spend.

Use Cases for PAYG (On-Demand)

Not every workload is a fit for long-term commitments. Azure’s pay-as-you-go model is better for certain scenarios where flexibility or short-term usage is the priority.

Here are prime use cases for choosing PAYG (on-demand) pricing:

• Short-term or bursty workloads. If you have a project or workload that runs only for a few weeks or sporadically (e.g., a seasonal marketing campaign or batch jobs that run infrequently), PAYG ensures you pay only for actual runtime. It’s ideal for bursty traffic scenarios where you might scale up resources for a spike and then turn them off – with no strings attached.
• Development, test, and lab environments. Non-production environments that are spun up temporarily for dev/test or sandbox experiments are great candidates for PAYG. These servers might be used during the day and shut off at night, or used for a month and then deleted. Paying the on-demand rate is fine here because you avoid paying for time when the environments aren’t needed. For example, a test VM that a team uses only occasionally should stay on pay-as-you-go rather than being reserved for a full year.
• Unpredictable or evolving workloads. If a workload’s future is uncertain or usage is highly unpredictable, the flexibility of PAYG outweighs the savings from a reservation. Startups or new applications often don’t know their steady-state needs yet. With on-demand pricing, you can freely scale your Azure services up, down, or even shut them off if needed, without worrying about unused prepaid capacity. In these cases, paying the premium rate is safer than committing to an RI that you might not fully use.

In summary, Azure on-demand (PAYG) is best when you need agility. You avoid any long contract, and you won’t risk money on resources you might not use long-term.

The trade-off is that you’ll pay more per hour. It’s a bit like renting by the day, expensive per day, but perfect if you only need something for a short time or you need the option to return it at any moment.

For more insights, see Azure Pricing Negotiation Strategies: How to Cut Your Cloud Bill.

Use Cases for Reserved Instances

Reserved Instances shine when you have known, stable resource needs. If you’re fairly certain a service will be running regularly, the cost benefits can be tremendous.

Here are the common use cases where purchasing Azure RIs makes the most sense:

• Always-on workloads running 24/7. Servers or services that run continuously are prime candidates for RIs. For example, think of production application servers, web servers, or domain controllers that must be on at all times. Since you’re going to incur charges 24/7 anyway, you might as well reserve them at a lower rate. Paying upfront (or committing for the year) locks in savings for something you know you’ll use every hour of every day.
• Databases and steady-demand applications. Many businesses have databases, analytics clusters, or internal applications that have predictable, steady usage. If your SQL database or VM-based application consistently uses a certain amount of compute, an RI will ensure you’re not paying full price for that known baseline. Essentially, for workloads with little day-to-day volatility in usage, reservations ensure you get a bulk discount on that steady consumption.
• Workloads running >7–10 months of the year. A good rule of thumb: if you expect an instance to be in use for the majority of a year (let’s say roughly 7+ months out of 12), a 1-year Reserved Instance will likely pay off. After around the 7–10 month mark of continuous usage, the money spent on an RI begins to be cheaper than what you would have paid on-demand for the same period. So, even if the workload isn’t 24/7 forever, as long as it’s going to stick around for more than, say, 70% of the year, it’s worth pricing out a reservation for it. This could include an ERP system that pauses operations over holidays but remains active for most of the year.
• Multi-year stable needs. Suppose you have a workload that you’re confident will remain in place for years (for example, a core business application or a legacy system that isn’t going anywhere). In that case, a 3-year RI provides the deepest discount. Multi-year commitments make sense for highly stable environments – perhaps an established product with consistent user demand or infrastructure for a long-term project. The 3-year Azure RI savings (around 50% or more vs. PAYG) are unbeatable for these scenarios. Just be sure that the resource requirements won’t dramatically change; a three-year lock-in is best for workloads you’d bet money will look the same for that period.

In essence, Azure Reserved Instances are like buying in bulk at a wholesale price – great when you know you’ll need a lot of a specific resource over time.

Organizations with predictable usage patterns can achieve significant cost efficiency by reserving those resources instead of paying the premium hourly rate indefinitely.

The key is confidence in the workload’s longevity and consistency. If that confidence is there, RIs can drastically cut costs and prevent overspending on the pay-as-you-go rates.

Flexibility of RIs in Azure

One historical downside of Reserved Instances (in any cloud) was the lack of flexibility – once you bought it, you were stuck with it. Azure has improved this situation in recent years, introducing features to reduce the risk of being “locked in” too tightly.

While RIs still require commitment, they aren’t completely rigid.

Here are some ways Azure RIs offer flexibility (and some remaining limitations to be aware of):

• Exchange or refund options: Azure allows you to exchange RIs or even cancel and refund them under certain conditions. If your needs change, you can trade an unused reserved instance for a different one of equal or greater value (for example, switching your reservation from one VM type/region to another). Alternatively, you can return an RI and get a prorated refund, up to a yearly refund limit (currently, Azure allows refunds up to a certain dollar amount per year). Keep in mind, Azure reserves the right to charge a penalty (around 12% early termination fee) for cancellations in the future, but as of now, this fee is often waived. Bottom line: you aren’t utterly stuck if something changes, but you should still plan RIs carefully. The exchange/refund capability is a safety valve to reduce waste, not an invitation to recklessly over-reserve.
• Scoped or shared reservations: When purchasing an Azure RI, you can choose the scope of the reservation. Scoping to a single subscription means the discount only applies to resources in that specific subscription. Shared scope (for enterprise agreements or billing accounts) means the reserved instance’s discount can be used by any matching resource across your organization’s subscriptions. This is a big flexibility boost – if one project winds down, another project’s VMs can take advantage of the spare reserved capacity as long as they’re under the shared scope and match the resource type/region. By sharing RIs across the whole enrollment or account, you reduce the chance of unused (wasted) reservation hours. It’s a way to pool your commitment so it’s utilized as much as possible.
• Still not as flexible as no commitment (or Savings Plans): Despite these improvements, RIs are inherently less flexible than pure pay-as-you-go. You are committing to specific resource types and regions (e.g., a D4sv3 VM in East US for 1 year). If your architecture changes (for example, you need a different VM size or need to move regions), an exchange or refund can be made to adjust things accordingly. Still, it’s not instantaneous and may come with limitations. Azure’s alternative Savings Plans offer a bit more flexibility by applying an hourly spending commitment across any compute usage (covering different VM sizes or services), which can be easier if your needs evolve – though Savings Plans typically offer slightly smaller discounts than RIs. The key point is that RIs offer the best savings for known, steady usage, but you sacrifice some flexibility. Azure mitigates this by allowing users to adjust or share reservations. Yet, you should still approach RIs with a clear understanding of your future needs to avoid any overspend on unused capacity.

Recommendation – How to Decide Between RI and PAYG

Choosing between Azure Reserved Instances vs. Pay-As-You-Go isn’t an all-or-nothing proposition. In practice, the optimal strategy for most organizations is a mix of both.

The question is how much to commit versus how much to leave on demand. To make informed decisions, take a strategic, data-driven approach.

Here’s how to evaluate and decide on the right balance:

1. Audit your top Azure cost drivers. Start by identifying where your Azure spend is going. Look at your billing reports and list out the top services or workloads that cost the most (for example, the top 10 resources by monthly spend). This helps you focus on the biggest “cost drivers” first. If a certain set of VMs or database instances is eating a large chunk of your budget, those are the first candidates to examine for savings opportunities. You can’t decide on reservations without knowing what’s costing you the most and why.
2. Identify stable, long-running workloads among them. For each of those top-cost resources, assess its usage pattern. Is it running 24/7 or close to it? Has it been consistently in use for months? High-utilization, steady workloads (e.g., a production web server cluster, or a data processing engine that runs daily) are prime candidates for RIs. Essentially, find the workloads where utilization is predictable and high. These are the places you are currently paying full price continuously – and thus stand to save the most by switching to a reserved rate.
3. Use 1-year RIs as a starting point (then expand to 3-year for confidence). It’s often wise to start with 1-year reservations for workloads you believe will stick around, especially if you’re a bit uncertain about long-term requirements. The 1-year term gives substantial savings but with less commitment than a 3-year. Monitor how it goes – if, after some time, the workload is indeed continuously used and stable, you can renew or extend that into a 3-year RI to capture even greater savings. In some cases, where you have full confidence (say, an internal tool your business will definitely need for 3+ years), jumping straight to a 3-year RI can maximize savings from the get-go. But if there’s any doubt, err on the side of caution: go 1-year first, or stagger your RI purchases so they don’t all end or start at once. This approach avoids getting locked into too many long commitments that you might regret, while still capturing savings early on.
4. Maintain a mix and monitor continuously. A balanced approach is usually best. Combine RIs with PAYG in your cloud environment to cover different needs. Keep your baseline, always-on usage covered by Reserved Instances – this ensures you’re paying the lowest rate for the things you know you’ll use no matter what. At the same time, leave room for PAYG where you need flexibility (new projects, variable spikes, one-off jobs). This mix prevents overspending in either direction: you’re not paying on-demand rates for everything (which would be expensive), but you’re also not over-committing to RIs that you might not use. Continually monitor your Azure usage and costs month by month. If you notice a PAYG resource has become predictable and costly over several months, that’s a signal to consider buying an RI for it. Conversely, if an RI is underutilized, you might need to adjust (use Azure’s exchange/refund if possible, or plan to not renew it). Cloud environments evolve, so revisiting your RI vs. on-demand allocations periodically (say quarterly) is a good practice to ensure you always have the right balance aligned with current usage.

By following these steps, you’ll make an informed decision that puts your budget first.

The guiding principle is: reserve what you can predict, pay-as-you-go what you can’t. This way, you capture savings wherever possible, but stay nimble wherever needed.

Checklist – RI vs. PAYG Decision

To summarize the evaluation process, use this quick checklist when deciding on Azure Reserved Instances versus Pay-As-You-Go for your workloads:

• Inventory your workloads – List your top-consuming workloads and note their utilization patterns (e.g., constant 24/7 usage or sporadic).
• Calculate break-even points – For each workload, determine roughly how many months of usage would justify a 1-year or 3-year RI. (Is it running enough months to make the RI’s lower rate worthwhile?)
• Assess longevity – Confirm that each candidate’s workload will be needed for at least the next 7–10 months (for a 1-year RI) or multiple years (for a 3-year RI) before committing.
• Review flexibility options – Check Azure’s RI exchange and refund policies so you know your options if needs change. Ensure you’re comfortable with the terms (e.g. potential fees or the $50K/year refund limit).
• Plan a mixed strategy – Decide which resources to keep on PAYG for flexibility and which to convert to RIs for savings. Aim for a balanced mix that minimizes cost without overcommitting. Regularly re-evaluate this mix to avoid any overspend as usage evolves.

By using the above checklist, you can confidently choose when to use Azure Reserved Instances vs. Pay-As-You-Go.

The right combination will help you maximize savings on steady workloads while preserving agility for changing needs – ultimately preventing cloud overspend and aligning your Azure costs with your actual business requirements.

Read about our Microsoft Negotiation Services

Do you want to know more about our Microsoft Negotiation Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit