Avoiding Microsoft Renewal Price Creep: How to Cap Annual Uplifts

Avoiding Microsoft Renewal Price Creep

Microsoft’s “price creep” is the practice of gradually raising software prices year over year, especially at contract renewals.

Over a multi-year Enterprise Agreement (EA), even modest yearly increases can compound into major budget overruns.

In this guide, we’ll explore how to negotiate caps on Microsoft price uplifts, ensuring escalating costs won’t blindside you. Read our guide to Microsoft Renewal Negotiation: How to Cap Price Uplifts and Secure Discounts.

Understanding Uplift Clauses

In a typical Microsoft contract, it’s common to see built-in annual price uplifts on licenses – often around 5% per year (sometimes more).

Some agreements explicitly tie yearly increases to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or inflation rates, while others have no stated limit at all. This means without protective clauses, your costs could rise 5–8% every year by default.

For example, if you start with a $1 million annual spend, a 5% yearly increase would push it to about $1.16 million by year 3. Higher uplifts or inflation-linked clauses can lead to even sharper climbs.

Without any cap, you’re exposed to unpredictable escalations – your budget can balloon far beyond initial projections by the end of a 3-year term.

Figure: Impact of different annual price increase rates on a $1M contract over five years. Even a 3% yearly uplift leads to about a 13% higher cost after five years, while 10% annually results in roughly a 46% increase. This illustrates how “price creep” adds up significantly over time.

In short, price creep can erode even a great discount you negotiated upfront.

To avoid this, you need to pay close attention to uplift clauses in your Microsoft agreements. If the contract draft says prices may be “adjusted to current Microsoft price lists” or tied to an inflation index without a cap, that’s a red flag.

Without an explicit cap, there is essentially no ceiling on how high Microsoft can raise your rates annually or at renewal.

Read our guide, Negotiating Microsoft Renewal Discounts: How to Avoid the “Loyalty Tax”.

Negotiation Approach: How to Cap Uplifts

The good news is that you can negotiate these uplifts.

The key is to secure a written cap on annual price increases in your contract. Verbal assurances from a sales rep like “we typically don’t raise prices much” mean nothing unless they’re in writing.

Here’s how to approach it:

• Insist on a Cap (Ideally 0–3%): Don’t simply accept Microsoft’s standard 5% (or higher) yearly increase. Push back and propose a maximum uplift of 3% per year, or even 0% (flat pricing) if you can. Many enterprises have successfully negotiated flat pricing for all 3 years of an EA, especially if they’re a big customer or if Microsoft is eager to close the deal. The smaller the cap, the better for your cost stability. Even a 1–3% cap provides far more protection than an open-ended 5%+ clause.
• Tie to CPI with a Ceiling: If Microsoft insists on linking increases to inflation (CPI), agree only with a firm ceiling. For instance, you might allow, “annual price increase equal to CPI, not to exceed 3%.” This way, if inflation shoots up to, say, 6% in a year, Microsoft can still only raise prices by the 3% cap. You benefit if inflation is low (perhaps 0% increase in some years), but you’re also protected from extreme economic swings.
• Example Contract Language: Include clear wording such as: “Pricing for all products shall remain fixed for the initial term, with any annual increase capped at 3% maximum.” Or, “In no event will annual list price adjustments exceed three percent (3%) year-over-year.” The exact phrasing can vary, but it must unambiguously limit the percentage increase per year. Without this clause, you’re exposed.
• No Cap, No Deal: Be prepared to stand firm. Make it clear to Microsoft that you will not sign without an acceptable cap on price increases. Often, Microsoft will concede to some cap rather than lose or shorten the deal. Remember, they want your business locked in – use that as leverage to get price protection.

Lastly, consider the trade-off between upfront discounts and caps.

Microsoft might dangle a big initial discount on Year 1 pricing, but plans to hike rates in Years 2 and 3. A one-time 15% discount loses its shine if you give back 5% each year in increases.

It’s often wiser to accept a slightly smaller upfront discount in exchange for a strict uplift cap. This ensures your total cost over the full term stays under control, rather than saving a bit on day one only to pay more later.

Stay away from these, Microsoft Renewal Negotiation Pitfalls: 5 Mistakes to Avoid.

Mid-Term vs. Renewal Uplifts

When negotiating, make sure to address both mid-term price protections and renewal price protections – they are related but distinct:

• Mid-Term Uplifts (Years 2–3 of Your EA): Microsoft EAs typically span three years. Without a cap, your Year 2 price for the same licenses could jump (e.g. 5% higher than Year 1), and Year 3 could jump again. Additionally, any new licenses you add mid-term (through “true-ups” or add-ons) might be charged at the then-current rates, which could be higher than your initial prices. This means if Microsoft raises the list price or if your discount was front-loaded, those extra licenses in year 2 or 3 cost more. To prevent this, negotiate in-term caps or even fixed pricing for the entire EA duration. Ideally, Year 2 and Year 3 unit prices remain the same as Year 1. If Microsoft won’t agree to flat pricing, they should at least agree that any annual increase is capped at a minimal rate (again, aim for 0–3%). Also, negotiate that any added licenses during the term use the same pricing and discount as the original ones, so expanding your usage doesn’t blow up your budget.
• Renewal Uplifts (Next Term’s Start): Many customers focus on the current term and forget about what happens at renewal. Microsoft often assumes that at the end of your EA, you’ll renew at the “then-current” list price for licenses, which by that time could be significantly higher. Any special discounts you had can expire. For example, if you enjoyed a 20% discount during your initial term, without renewal protection ,the price might snap back to full list (effectively a 25% increase) in the renewal quote. This is often referred to as the renewal price reset or a price cliff. To counter this, negotiate renewal price caps or extensions of your discounts. You might include a clause upfront like, “Upon the first renewal, the price per unit will not increase more than 5% from the Year 3 price” (5% is an example – if you can get 0% or something like CPI capped at 3%, even better). The goal is to lock in some predictability for the next term now, while you have negotiating leverage. Even if Microsoft resists giving a fixed renewal price, getting an agreed maximum limit on the increase is far better than no protection at all.

In summary, protect yourself both during the EA and after the EA.

Capping in-term raises ensures you realize the full value of your negotiated deal over the three years.

Capping renewal increases ensures you don’t face a nasty surprise when it’s time to sign the next deal.

Framing It as Win-Win

When pushing for uplift caps, it helps to frame the request as a win-win, rather than a demand that only benefits you. How do you do this?

Remember that Microsoft, as a vendor, values predictability in its revenue and forecasts. You, as the customer, value predictability in your IT spend.

By agreeing to a reasonable cap on price increases, both sides gain stability: you know your costs won’t spiral, and Microsoft knows you’ve budgeted and committed to continue the relationship.

Position the cap as a form of risk-sharing.

For instance, you might say: “We’re willing to commit to a three-year agreement and invest in more Microsoft technologies over that time. In exchange, we just ask for predictability in pricing – say, a maximum 3% increase per year. That way, we can plan our budget and avoid surprises. It protects us from huge jumps, and it ensures that Microsoft retains loyal customers. We both share a bit of the risk if inflation or other factors change.”

This kind of narrative can make the Microsoft account team feel more comfortable that a cap isn’t just you squeezing them – it’s you showing long-term commitment and partnership as well.

You can also offer trade-offs to make it win-win.

For example, if Microsoft is pushing a new product or cloud service (perhaps Azure credits, security add-ons, or the new AI-powered Copilot feature), express openness to adopting some of it now or in the future, but only if the pricing is stable. E.g., “We’ll consider adding Microsoft Copilot licenses for our users, but we need to ensure those rates won’t increase more than 2% annually during the term.”

This way, Microsoft gains incremental revenue and a success story, while you gain price protection on those new services.

Finally, emphasize that a cap in the contract helps avoid future conflicts.

It’s better for the relationship if both parties know the boundaries – you won’t have to fight over a massive increase later, and Microsoft won’t have to worry about you refusing to renew due to sticker shock. It’s essentially predictable for both sides, which is a reasonable ask in a partnership.

Alternatives if Microsoft Refuses Caps

What if you push, and Microsoft still flat-out refuses to include any cap on increases? Perhaps they say “our policy is to align with market pricing” or “we can’t set future prices in stone.”

In that case, you need to consider alternative strategies to protect your organization:

• Shorter-Term Deals: One option is to shorten the contract term. If Microsoft won’t limit annual increases in a 3-year EA, propose a 1-year or 2-year term instead. A shorter commitment limits your exposure to unchecked price hikes. You’ll have the opportunity to renegotiate sooner and adjust if pricing becomes unfavorable. Microsoft may not like shorter terms (because they prefer the stability of longer commitments), but it can be a compromise if they won’t budge on a cap. Essentially, if they want the flexibility to raise prices often, you should retain the right to walk away or rebid the contract more frequently.
• Benchmarking Clauses: Another approach is to include a clause that ties renewal pricing to external benchmarks or “fair market value.” For example, an agreement might state that at renewal, pricing will be no worse than the average market price for similar Microsoft deals or that you have the right to benchmark the proposed renewal against other providers. While Microsoft rarely volunteers such language, bringing up the idea can put pressure on them to keep any increases reasonable. Even without a formal clause, you can signal that if the renewal pricing isn’t competitive by market standards, you’ll explore alternatives. This threat can sometimes keep Microsoft’s renewal offer in check if a hard cap isn’t on the table.
• Mix-and-Match Models: You don’t have to put all your eggs in the EA basket. If Microsoft won’t provide price protections in an EA, consider splitting your purchase model between EA and other licensing channels. Critical, stable workloads (the things you know you’ll need for 3 years) can stay in the EA so you get volume discounts and stability for those. Meanwhile, for more flexible or rapidly changing needs, consider using the Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) program or other short-term subscriptions. CSP agreements often operate on monthly or annual subscriptions with the ability to adjust quantities or cancel more easily. While CSP prices can change more frequently, you have the agility to renegotiate or switch providers if they become too costly. For instance, you might keep core Office 365 users on an EA (protected from price hikes during the term) but buy something like Power BI Pro licenses through a CSP on an annual basis – that way, if Microsoft jacks up that price, you could decide not to renew those or look at third-party alternatives for that function. By diversifying your licensing approach, you create natural check-points to renegotiate pricing on parts of your environment and avoid being locked into across-the-board increases.
• Escalation and Competition: If caps are a no-go with your sales rep, consider escalating the conversation. Engage Microsoft management or even hint at running a competitive RFP. Microsoft has competition (Google Workspace, AWS for some services, etc.), and while you might not intend to switch, the mere prospect can make Microsoft reconsider hardline stances. Sometimes, introducing their competitors during negotiation can soften their approach to price protections. It essentially tells Microsoft, “If you can’t give us cost predictability, we have other options to consider.”

Using one or a combination of these tactics can mitigate the risk of unchecked price increases.

The main idea is to avoid being stuck in a high-increase contract for too long. If Microsoft insists on maintaining the right to raise prices freely, then you need to maintain the right to walk away or re-evaluate frequently.

That balance of power will keep them more honest.

Uplift Risks vs. Negotiation Strategies

To summarize the discussion of uplift “gotchas” and how to respond, here’s a quick reference table of common scenarios and the recommended negotiation response:

Each scenario requires vigilance. The common theme is obtaining written commitments that limit how much and how often Microsoft can raise your fees.

FAQs

What is a Microsoft CPI cap?

A “CPI cap” is a contract clause that ties any annual price increase to the Consumer Price Index (inflation rate), but with a fixed maximum limit.

In practice, it means Microsoft can only raise your prices by the lesser of the actual inflation rate or the agreed cap.

For example, if CPI inflation is 6% but you have a 3% CPI cap, your prices would only go up 3%. This protects you from runaway hikes in high-inflation periods while still giving Microsoft a modest inflation-based adjustment.

Can price uplifts be negotiated?

Absolutely. Price uplifts are negotiable – but only if you address them upfront and get the terms in writing. Microsoft’s standard offer might include annual increases, but customers (especially large enterprises or those prepared to push back) have successfully negotiated them down or even eliminated them for the contract term.

The key is to bring it up during negotiations: if you simply sign the first quote, you’re agreeing to those increases. Always counter-propose with a cap or a no-increase clause. Remember, once the contract is signed, you can’t change it, so negotiate the uplifts beforehand.

What’s the safest cap to aim for?

The ideal scenario is 0% – meaning flat pricing for the duration of your agreement. If Microsoft won’t agree to flat prices, aim as low as possible, typically 1–3% at most per year. A cap in the low single digits generally stays below typical inflation and certainly below Microsoft’s usual 5%+ increase.

Many customers target around 3% as a maximum compromise if they can’t achieve 0%. The lower the cap, the safer for your budget. Ultimately, the safest cap is the one that you feel your organization can comfortably absorb (or that aligns with expected inflation) – but always start by asking for no increase at all and negotiate from there.

Do caps apply to add-ons and new products, too?

They should – if you negotiate it. Caps won’t automatically cover new products or add-on licenses unless you explicitly include them.

Suppose you plan to possibly purchase additional services (like Microsoft Teams Phone, the new AI-based Copilot, extra security, or Power BI modules, etc.) during the term. In that case, you need to address those in your negotiation.

For instance, you might add language that any new licenses or services added will either use the same discounted pricing as the original licenses or will also be subject to the same annual cap.

Alternatively, negotiate a fixed price for those add-ons now (even if you add them later). The goal is to avoid a situation where your core licenses are capped at 3% but then you adopt a new Microsoft product mid-term, and its price shoots up without regulation. Make sure the spirit of the cap – price protection – covers everything you might spend money on under that agreement.

What if Microsoft won’t agree to any cap?

If, despite your best efforts, Microsoft won’t grant a cap on price increases, you need to protect yourself through other means. One way is to shorten the contract term, as mentioned earlier – for example, opt for a 1-year or 2-year deal so you’re not locked in long term and can renegotiate sooner.

Another approach is to include a benchmark or review clause, allowing you to revisit pricing if it becomes too high (or at least have the right to exit without penalty if Microsoft’s prices exceed a certain threshold).

You should also consider getting competitive quotes or keeping some leverage outside the contract – Microsoft might soften its stance if it knows you’re prepared to switch some workloads to other vendors or not renew at all.

In essence, if no cap is forthcoming, don’t simply sign a bad deal for a long period.

Use flexibility, competition, and frequent renegotiation as your tools to prevent being stuck with sky-high rates.

Five Expert Recommendations

1. Never accept a contract without explicit caps on the potential for upward adjustments. If the draft agreement doesn’t clearly limit year-over-year price increases, insist that it’s added. No cap = open invitation for big hikes.
2. Push for 0–3% maximum annual increases (tied to CPI if needed). Don’t settle for the standard 5%+ uplifts. Aim for flat pricing, but if you must concede, keep the cap as low as possible (within a typical inflation range or lower).
3. Apply caps to add-ons and new services, too. Ensure your price protections extend to things like Microsoft Copilot, additional Azure services, or extra licenses you might add. Otherwise, those can become loopholes for price creep.
4. Lock in renewal price protections, not just in-term pricing. Don’t only focus on the current term — negotiate a cap or agreed discount for your renewal so you aren’t hit with a huge jump after three years. Roll over your protections into the next deal.
5. Use contract length and commitments as leverage. If you’re willing to sign a longer term or make a big upfront purchase, use that as a bargaining chip to secure price caps. Conversely, be ready to choose a shorter term or smaller deal if Microsoft won’t cooperate on uplifts. Your flexibility in deal structure is a valuable tool for securing the terms you need for cost stability.

By following these strategies, CIOs and procurement leaders can effectively cap Microsoft’s renewal price creep. The result is a more predictable IT budget and a partnership with Microsoft that’s based on transparency and fairness, rather than surprises.

Capping annual uplifts requires some negotiation savvy and backbone, but the payoff is well worth it: you’ll avoid nasty budget shocks and keep your Microsoft spend under control year after year.

Read about our Advisory Services

Do you want to speak with us about our Microsoft Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit